Search for: "Deborah Coleman" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2023, 10:54 am by Michael C. Dorf
Coleman (1982), in which the Supreme Court upheld "tester" standing under the Fair Housing Act (FHA). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 1:35 pm by Amy Howe
The owner of a Maine hotel argued that because the tester, Deborah Laufer, never intended to stay at the hotel, she does not have a legal right to bring a lawsuit. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 2:36 pm by Amy Howe
Coleman, Laufer says, makes clear that a tester like her has standing to challenge discrimination. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:45 pm by Richard Hunt
Coleman for the notion that testers can suffer a statutory injury, so it seems Haven would have to be overruled to decide against Laufer. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal As Trump Slumps, Republican Donors Look to Save the Senate New York Times – Shane Goldmacher | Published: 7/20/2020 President Trump’s weak poll numbers and a surge of Democratic cash flooding key Senate races have jolted top Republicans and intensified talk among party donors and strategists about redirecting money to protect their narrow Senate Republican majority amid growing fear of complete Democratic control of Washington in 2021. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 8:24 am by Eugene Volokh
Groff, playwright Sarah Haider, activist Jonathan Haidt, NYU-Stern Roya Hakakian, writer Shadi Hamid, Brookings Institution Jeet Heer, The Nation Katie Herzog, podcast host Susannah Heschel, Dartmouth College Adam Hochschild, author Arlie Russell Hochschild, author Eva Hoffman, writer Coleman Hughes, writer/Manhattan Institute Hussein Ibish, Arab Gulf States Institute Michael Ignatieff Zaid Jilani, journalist Bill T. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Doron Dorfman, Syracuse University College of Law, Of Worthy and Worthier Blood: Gay Families, Anti-HIV Medication, and the Blood Ban Doriane Lambelet Coleman, Duke Law School, Legal Issues in Decision-making for Adolescents Who Seek Gender Affirming Care F. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm by Bridget Crawford
Asay cdasay BYU       Christy Hurt ach_ BYU       Gordon Smith professor_smith BYU       Ari Ezra Waldman ariezrawaldman Cal Western       James Coleman energylawprf Calgary       Jassmine Girgis JassmineGirgis Calgary Corporate restructuring Corporate law Contracts Lorian Hardcastle Lorian_H Calgary Health law     Ian Holloway LawDeanHolloway Calgary       Fenner Stewart fennerstewart… [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Coleman: Not necessarily b/c it pops up somewhere else. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Glenn Cohen CohenProf Harvard Julie  Cohen  julie17usc  Georgetown David Cole DavidColeGtown Georgetown James Coleman energylawprf Calgary Jennifer Collins jmcollinsSMULaw SMU Richard Collins DrRichCollins Univ College Dublin Sutherland James P. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am by Bridget Crawford
Glenn Cohen CohenProf Harvard David Cole DavidColeGtown Georgetown James Coleman energylawprf Calgary Richard Collins DrRichCollins Univ College Dublin Sutherland Jennifer Collins jmcollinsSMULaw SMU James P. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Keith Tallon Cook Taylor Caroline Landes   McMillan Williams Helen MacDonald Aitken Associates Martin Wray Aitken Associates Kelly Wild   Aitken Associates Peter Harris Harris Temperley Caron Theobalds Harris Temperley Stewart Hughan Harris Temperley Nina Shaw  Harris Temperley Philip Wilkins  Hudgell & Partners Elizabeth Bendall Sternberg Reed Gordon Reed Sternberg Reed Darren Ward Sternberg Reed Jenny Morrison Morrison Spowart Karen Forrester Mackesys Caroline… [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:10 pm
Deborah D., in which a man was attempting to establish paternity for a child he had fathered through artificial insemination with a woman he was intimately involved with but to whom he was not married. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Joshua Matz
” In commentary for the (Albany) Times-Union, linguistics professor Deborah Tannen argues against requiring cameras in the Court, since “doing so could instead bolster the politicizing of the court — and thereby weaken it. [read post]