Search for: "Deborah Hellman"
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
Below Deborah Hellman (whose work we recently featured in an online symposium) offers her thoughts on the Supreme Court’s reinstatement of the injunction against Arizona’s matching fund law: On Tuesday, the Supreme Court reinstated the injunction against the application of Arizona’s matching fund law. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:14 pm
In my earlier post, I suggested that Deborah Hellman is right to focus on the relationship between rights and resources. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:45 am
Deborah Hellman’s marvelous essay aims to establish that “Money is not speech,” and who could disagree with that? [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:58 pm
Deborah Hellman’s article is so wonderful and clear-headed that it makes you feel downright healthy, as if someone had gone into the weeds and, in fact, weeded them. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:05 am
It is a great honor to participate in this symposium on Deborah Hellman’s fine article. [read post]
3 May 2010, 6:35 am
Concurring Opinions introduces a cyber-symposium on Deborah Hellman’s article “Money Talks, But It Isn’t Speech,” which challenges the central premise of Citizens United and the rest of “campaign finance law, namely that restrictions on giving and spending money constitute restrictions on speech and thus can only be justified by compelling governmental interests. [read post]
2 May 2010, 8:41 pm
It’s an honor to introduce Deborah Hellman and the participants in this cyber-symposium. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:39 am
The Download of the Week is Money Talks But it Isn't Speech by Deborah Hellman. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:10 am
Deborah Hellman (University of Maryland - School of Law) has posted Money Talks But it Isn't Speech (Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 3, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
27 May 2009, 11:07 am
Deborah Hellman sent me the following thoughts on the California Supreme Court's Prop 8 decision and Peter Westen, which I post below: "Peter Westen famously argued that equality is an empty idea. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:32 pm
My colleague Deborah Hellman had intriguing insights on yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in AT&T v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
In a post on Balkinization yesterday, Deborah Hellman criticizes the fact that the briefs in the case focus heavily on the question of what exactly the New Haven fire department intended to do. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:46 pm
If you are at all interested in the Ricci case, please take a moment to read this posting by Deborah Hellman which discusses the Ricci case, but also critiques some of the underlying assumptions in equal protection jurisprudence. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 4:19 pm
Over at Balkinization, Deborah Hellman (Maryland) has this second in a series of posts on her new book: When is Discrimination Wrong? [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 9:15 am
Deborah Hellman[This is the 2nd in a series of posts on my book: When is Discrimination Wrong? [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 7:46 am
Deborah HellmanJustice Stevens, in the parts of his opinion in Davis v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:30 am
Deborah HellmanLaws, policies and actions by individuals routinely draw distinctions among people on the basis of all sorts of traits. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:47 am
(One notable exception is Deborah Hellman's post on Balkinization.) [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:28 pm
Deborah Hellman has written a timely book, When is Discrimination Wrong? [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 9:00 pm
Finally, Balkinization contains this commentary by Deborah Hellman (”right result, wrong reason”), the ACSBlog includes this brief post, and Paul Secunda’s thoughts from the Workplace Prof Blog can be found here. [read post]
