Search for: "Deitz v. Deitz"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2015, 12:47 pm
In Deitz v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 4:15 am
This week at SCOTUS: The Solicitor General waived response in Deitz v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:58 pm
This week at SCOTUS: Deitz v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:51 am
Deitz appealed, arguing both that the decision was wrong and that the bankruptcy court had no authority to make a final judgment, thanks to the Supreme Court's 2011 ruling in Stern v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 10:00 am
This week at SCOTUS: A petition for a writ of certiorari was docketed on 12 December in Deitz v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 6:30 am
This week at SCOTUS: The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Deitz v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 5:42 am
Judge Conner of the Middle District of Pennsylvania (my home district) issued a memorandum opinion covering this issue in Deitz v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:58 pm
Woodruff, North Carolina Family Law Specialist Winston Salem, North Carolina: Malecek v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:58 pm
Woodruff, North Carolina Family Law Specialist Winston Salem, North Carolina: Malecek v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:00 am
Deitz, __ F.3d __ (6th Cir. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 2:00 am
"Nonprecedential decisions" sometimes make me a little crazy. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 3:35 am
Plaintiff did not meet its initial burden of establishing that defendants “failed to exercise that degree of care, skill, and diligence commonly possessed and exercised by a member of the legal community” (Greene v Payne, Wood & Littlejohn , 197 AD2d 664, 666 [2d Dept 1993]; see Deitz v Kelleher & Flink , 232 AD2d 943, 944 [3d Dept 1996]). [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Deitz, 577 F.3d 672, 687-88 (6th Cir. 2009) (rejecting defendant's Fourth Amendment argument concerning a warrantless search of his briefcase, noting that although the search violated Gant, the officers' conduct was lawful in 1998 when the stop occurred); United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:31 am
Accordingly, plaintiff's proposed amended complaint sufficiently states a claim for legal [*2]malpractice (Deitz v Kelleher & Flink, 232 AD2d 943 [1996]; see also Tenzer, Greenblatt, Fallon & Kaplan v Ellenberg, 199 AD2d 45 [1993]). [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 4:16 am
(Cf Deitz vKelleher & Flink, 232 AD2d 943 [3d Dept 1996] [defendant cannot use own negligence to shield itself from malpractice]). [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
In Matter of Deitz's Estate a contrary opinion was expressed. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
In Matter of Deitz's Estate a contrary opinion was expressed. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:47 am
Feb. 13, 2008); Deitz v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:23 pm
Deitz, 2010 WL 744273, at *2 & n.2. [read post]
