Search for: "Dempsey v. Smith"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 7:14 am
Smith J. helpfully summarised in his recent decision in Edmondson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:32 am
In its per curiam opinion, the Court noted that it had previously held that using an address was not sufficient if the defect was actually across the street from the address provided and also approximately 40 yards away from the address, Smith v City of Warren, 11 Mich App 449 (1968), and that identifying an intersection is not sufficiently precise if the notice does not specify which corner the defect is at, Dempsey v Detroit, 4 Mich App 150… [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 8:25 am
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:25 pm
MittsDocket: 10-1000Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:36 pm
On September 23, 2009, the Pennsylvania Superior Court handed down a monumental UIM decision in the case of Pusl v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Dec. 30, 2009) (applying Colorado law); Smith v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:54 am
In addition to Strayhorn, our innovator liability scorecard includes Smith v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
Wells pointed out that the opinion contains “a hint of reluctance,” even as it applied Smith v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:21 pm
Ct. 1640 (2010) (Apr. 21, 2010), the United States Supreme Court held that a plan adminstrator’s discretionary authority to interpret a plan is entitled to deference, even if a prior determination with regard to the same claim was invalid.Estate planning with retirement assetsArnstein & LehrFor many individuals, retirement benefits represent a significant portion of their wealth.Second Circuit finds that class arbitration waiver clause is unconscionable, refuses to compel… [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
Pion, Pion, Johnston, Nerone, Girman, Clements & Smith, Pittsburgh, PA, for Defendants. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]
