Search for: "Dennis v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 1,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am by Christine Corcos
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Substantive Patent Law: Newly filed petition in Merck & Cie v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am by Ronald Collins and David Skover
Waxman), and certain Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives (Paul M. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 2:12 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 261 (patent holder “may … grant and convey an exclusive right under his application for patent, or patents, to the whole or any specified part of the United States”). [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 3:37 pm by Holly
    Canceling a Patent Claim February 1, 2023 | Dennis Crouch “The pending case of Jump Rope Systems v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 8:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Officers of the United States must be nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate; inferior Officers may be appointed by a head-of-department if authorized by Congress. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 5:49 pm by Charnovitz
United States) cites numerous prior customs court and appellate decisions. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:58 am by Sheppard Mullin
On October 15, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Jovani Fashion, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]