Search for: "Dennis v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 1,019
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
Hewitt, doesn't this [questioning the effectiveness of the Church's enactment of the Dennis Canon] call into question the teaching of Jones v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:00 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch United Cannabis Corp (UCANN) vs. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
 The IPKat learned yesterday that the United Kingdom's Minister for Intellectual Property, Baroness Neville-Rolfe, is to visit that sadly-troubled entity, the European Patent Office. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:25 pm by Matthew Kahn
Nada Bakos and Dennis Gleeson approximated what a foreign intelligence analysis of the United States might look like right now. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
”) Post Grant Admin: Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 7:33 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the United States Tax Court stated that "if a settlement agreement lacks express language stating what the amount paid pursuant to that agreement was to settle, the intent of the payor is critical to that determination. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 8:50 am by Ron Coleman
 As counsel for Amazon argued: “[T]he law of the United States is a copyright owner may sit back, do nothing and enjoy his property rights untrammeled byothers exploiting his works without permission. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 2:11 pm by Barbara Moreno
Walker, First Amendment and State Bans on Teachers’ Religious Garb:  Analyzing the Historic Origins of Contemporary Legal Challenges in the United States (2020). [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 6:35 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Informed Delivery The United States Postal Service will complete its roll out of Informed Delivery in 2017. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 3:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2022) Having found the dispute over the ’562 patent moot, the court next considered the proper disposition—whether to simply dismiss the appeal or also vacate the PTAB decision under United States v. [read post]