Search for: "Department of Employment v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 4,212
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by John Elwood
The court also denied review in a case in which the Missouri Department of Corrections claimed it had been deprived of a fair trial in an employment discrimination case because the judge struck potential jurors who had religious objections to homosexuality. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Subsequently, on or about September 6, 2012, defendant filed a discrimination lawsuit on plaintiff’s behalf in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen v Chanel, Inc., et al., 12-cv-6758 (LAP). [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am by Trent Dykes
Even if a final rule is immediately challenged and/or enjoined, employers should consider the FTC’s (and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division’s) hostile posture toward agreements that can restrict labor market competition. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by Ortiz Law Firm
In 2016, the Department of Labor (DOL) began a review of its procedures with the help of insurance plans, employers, advocacy groups, and disabled workers. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:09 am by CFM Admin
Principal place of business and, if that address is not in the United States, the primary location of the company in the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On 14 February 2024 there will be a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:29 am by Silver Law Group
UBS Securities LLC et al., case number 22-660, before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The first clause—what John Vlahoplus helpfully refers to as the “Positions Clause”—identifies the government offices and other employments that a covered rebel or insurrectionist is prohibited from “hold[ing]. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Sharp v Ferrante Law Firm, 2023 NY Slip Op 05383 [220 AD3d 587], October 24, 2023the Appellate Division, First Department found that there was no collateral estoppel, but nevertheless, the case was untimely. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]