Search for: "Department of Motor Vehicles v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
Department of Motor Vehicles (Cal. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
April 19, 2023) (Op. by Mundy, J.), the court issued a decision that favored insurance carriers by ruling that the removal of a vehicle from a multiple motor vehicle insurance policy, in which stacked coverage had been previously waived through a waiver form executed by the insured, did not require the insurance carrier to secure another written waiver of stacked coverage from the insured under Section 1738(c).Now, with its January, 2024 decision in the case of… [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 11:44 am
The company’s director explained that it was unable to locate the driver’s employment file, but produced his motor vehicle records, drug screens, driver’s license, and Department of Transportation certification. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:09 am
(Concurring Op. by Wecht, J.).The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that, as presented in this case, the Regular Use Exclusion contained in motor vehicle insurance policies does not violate the express language of Pennsylvania's Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law [MVFRL].The Plaintiff in Rush was a police officer who was injured in a motor vehicle accident while driving his police vehicle. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
After an Alameda County Superior Court ruling [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
State of California, Dept. of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 11:39 am
Superior Court of Kern County (Cal. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
See Getting v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Three years later, the Court decided Daimler AG v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 5:48 am
North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles, 455 F. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
On January 22, 2018, Nilsson filed a complaint in federal court in California alleging negligence by General Motors. [read post]
28 May 2021, 7:45 am
Hope in the District Court… In California Trucking Association v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:31 pm
OPERATED A MOTOR VEHICLE WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED STATUTE, N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.]POINT IIITHE DEFENDANT['S] . . . [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 12:48 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in New Prime v. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
” SCOV emphasizes that its holding in Berard was narrow and limited to the idea that a civil motor vehicle violation standing alone is generally not enough to uphold an impeding-an-officer conviction. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 12:44 pm
If you have not yet read United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm
For example, the Ninth Circuit held that the Fifth Circuit erred in Texas v. [read post]
