Search for: "Department of Motor Vehicles v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Department of Motor Vehicles (1982) 32 Cal.3d 347, 361 (Ford Dealers).) [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
Democratic National CommitteeIssue: (1) Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit misinterpreted United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am
In Smith, the Superior Court stated that the court in Pusl had correctly decided that a section of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, i.e., 75 Pa.C.S.A. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am
In Smith, the Superior Court stated that the court in Pusl had correctly decided that a section of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, i.e., 75 Pa.C.S.A. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
Maxwell, an employee of the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), assisted [Laiwala] by processing false DMV test scores, and Howard assisted in obtaining false Social Security numbers.People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
The Dailey-Console case arose out of a motor vehicle accident. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:44 pm
The daughter of Clifford Nilan, head of probation for Berkshire Superior Court, pleaded guilty to one charge of misdemeanor negligent operation of a motor vehicle. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:44 am
Drunk driving, albeit a very serious charge, is not considered a dangerous crime but instead is classified as a motor vehicle violation. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
Supreme Court discussed the financial position of the parties, including defendant's superior earning capacity, and otherwise adequately explained its reasons for awarding counsel fees. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
As observed in prior cases surrounding this statue, the court has found that operating a motor vehicle includes all of the acts performed in the movement of a motor vehicle from one place to another. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 11:54 am
In the Mercer case, the Superior court issued a writ of mandate directing the Department of Motor Vehicles to set aside its order revoking Mercer's driving privilege. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 11:54 am
In the Mercer case, the Superior court issued a writ of mandate directing the Department of Motor Vehicles to set aside its order revoking Mercer's driving privilege. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
Both cases rely upon last year's Superior Court decision in the case of Zaleppa v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:22 pm
Department of Motor Vehicles (1991) 53 Cal.3d 753 that the term “drive” as used in Vehicle Code section 23512 (prohibiting driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs), requires proof of “volitional movement. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:01 am
Quick question: If you’re in a Massachusetts motor vehicle accident with an off-duty police officer, and he or she prevents you from either driving away or leaving the scene of the accident until the appropriate police department arrives, is that an “arrest” for legal purposes? [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:20 am
Superior Court (Covalt) was not satisfied, the California Public Utilities Code 1759 was not implicated, and the district court retained subject matter jurisdiction over the case. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
http://j.st/pb6 Palmer v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
HOWARD DINNER, D.C., P.A., a/a/o DENISE CHAPMAN, Respondent. 4th District.Civil procedure -- Default on motor vehicle lease -- Summary judgment -- Trial court properly entered summary judgment where there were no issues of material fact -- Remand for correction of scrivener's errorGEORGE C. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 2:13 am
The district court granted the motion and the court affirmed, holding that because New York state courts have the ability to implement a remedy that the federal courts could not, Levin v. [read post]
