Search for: "Department of Motor Vehicles v. Superior Court" Results 101 - 120 of 134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2010, 9:20 am by The Law Offices of David S. Shrager
In a 1994 Pennsylvania case, the Court listened to a defendant's argument that the charges of motor vehicle violations and drug charges he was fighting should be dropped. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:31 am by Meyers Nave
Superior Court (Pitchess motions) to request peace officer personnel records are not available in administrative per se hearings conducted by the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) on driver’s license suspensions. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
In a motion filed Friday in federal court, the EPA and health department say the court should approve the agreement reached in November. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:16 pm
============================================If you are interested in learning more about disciplinary actions please click here: http://thedisciplinebook.blogspot.com/2009/03/discipline-book.html============================================The Guastafeste case focused on the issue of providing the employee with sufficient information concerning the charges in order for him or her to be able to prepare his or her defense so that it cannot rightfully be claimed that the individual was found guilty acts… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
(Vernick, Jon S. and Teret, Stephen P., Making Vehicles Safer, Am J Public Health. 2004 February; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management) There is widespread agreement that these reductions can be credited in part to safer products, better regulation and increased public awareness. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
Brown assisted Currier with the motor vehicle stop. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
– EPA News Release, February 22, 2010 Cummins Inc., a major motor vehicle engine company based in Columbus, Ind., will pay a $2.1 million penalty and recall 405 engines under a settlement agreement resolving violations of the Clean Air Act, the U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 9:33 am by John W. Arden
A class action was superior to other methods of adjudicating the claims, in the court's view. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The underlying rationale was that since these post-Koken claims arose out of the same "transaction or occurrence," i.e., the same motor vehicle accident and involved similar factual and legal issues, they should be consolidated under one lawsuit. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 9:00 pm
Department of Motor Vehicles official certifying that its records revealed no evidence of an operator's permit having been issued to appellant. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The Court had asked for briefing on whether Jackson should be overturned in the context of Montejo v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:49 am
 S2618 SCHNEIDERMAN -- Relates to prosecution by superior court information following dismissal of an indictment or count thereof No Same asBLURB : CP L. rel to prosec by sup ct infLast Act: 03/16/09 referred to codesLast Action Date: 03/17/09(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 6:30 pm
Accordingly, we remand to the Sullivan Superior Court with instructions to transfer this matter to the Howard Superior Court. [read post]