Search for: "Department of Revenue v. Public Service Co." Results 41 - 60 of 345
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2022, 11:06 am by Casey Lide
If the IRS is unable to solve the problem, Congressional action may ultimately be necessary. [1] Internal Revenue Service, “CARES Act Coronavirus Relief Fund frequently asked questions,” accessed 3/1/2022. [2] Internal Revenue Service, Publication 937 Business Reporting, IRS Pub. 937, 1989 WL 508466 (1989). [3] Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:18 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 28/1/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v… [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:06 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June… [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:21 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June… [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:32 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June… [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
For example, nine of the 31 SPAC-related securities suits filed during 2021 (21%) involved companies in the electric vehicle industry. 14 of the 31 SPAC-related lawsuits (45%) involved companies that had experienced stock price drops following the publication of short-seller reports. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October  Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October  Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October  Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October  Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:23 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and… [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am by Kristian Soltes
In public Visa has downplayed concerns about the rise of RuPay, which has been supported by public lobbying from Prime Minister Narendra Modi that has included likening the use of local cards to national service. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am by Kristian Soltes
In public Visa has downplayed concerns about the rise of RuPay, which has been supported by public lobbying from Prime Minister Narendra Modi that has included likening the use of local cards to national service. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:52 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and… [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and… [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 1:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and… [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 8:47 pm by Race to the Bottom
Furthermore, NFTs are taxable property, and any person buying or selling them must report sales, taxes, profits, and losses to the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
Low prices for this service can force rivals to depart, thereby directly reducing competition. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
David Lametti, as he then was, before he became a Member of Parliament and then Minister of Justice, were my colleagues, co-counsel and clients in an intervention in the immediate forerunner to the current SCC decision, namely, the case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]