Search for: "Department of Revenue v. Public Service Co." Results 101 - 120 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2014, 4:54 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Morgan Stanley & Co International Plc v Tael One Partners Ltd, heard 17 November 2014. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Internal Revenue Service 13-1269Issue: Whether, contrary to the Federal Circuit's decision in USA Choice Internet Services, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:22 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The 2018 maximum deductible Health Savings Account (HSA) contribution for individuals with family coverage under a high deductible health plan (HDHP) is $6,900, rather than the lower $$6850 limitation that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Department of Treasury originally identified as the 2018 maximum deduction amount last March. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:10 am
Revenues increased marginally, by 1 percent, to $634 million in 2008. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:36 am by SHG
“We’re seeing it all over, medical co-pays, cost of incarceration claims, you name it. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am by John Jascob
(See Loss, Seligman & Paredes, Securities Regulation, a Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory U.S. publication, at Chapter 8.A.1.). [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 November 2016. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 4:01 am by Administrator
Bell Telephone Co. of Canada(1904), [1905] A.C. 52, [1905] 1 Olmsted 505, Régie des services publics c. [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Verify Character and Implications of Proposed Features and Products Alone & In Conjunction With Overall Benefit Design To Avoid Unexpected Exposures As employer and other plan sponsors, insurers, and their service providers continue to struggle to understand and select the health plan options legally allowed when the next wave of the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act (ACA) health care reforms take effect on January 1, 2014, recent guidance from the Departments of… [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Chris Castle
Yet, this is exactly what the DOJ says that ASCAP must now do: “[F]or a song co-written by one ASCAP member and one BMI member, the co-writers might designate the ASCAP member to collect all revenues from the licensing of public performance rights to the song and require that the ASCAP member distribute a share of the revenues to the BMI member. [read post]