Search for: "Department of Revenue v. Public Service Co." Results 121 - 140 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 November 2016. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:46 pm by vforberger
TetraTech The Department of Justice’s newly-created solicitor general’s office represents both the Department of Revenue and the Department of Workforce Development in these cases. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The heavy reliance by group health plans and health insurers upon internet based applications and portals to carry out online enrollment, claims administration and payment, reporting and a host of other key health plan functions makes it particularly important for health plans, their employer or other sponsors, fiduciaries, vendors, and other involved in health plan administration or using or accessing health plan data to verify and ensure the internet data sharing and other applications and portals… [read post]
Bruen’The Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in NYSRPA v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 November 2016. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 November 2016. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
Department of Justice adopt a more global prosecution approach. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
The indictment charged Peters with making, and causing to be made and presented, false claims to the Internal Revenue Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm by Barry Sookman
At a minimum the party to be bound must be shown to have been aware of the Terms and Conditions at the time of purchase: see Kobelt Manufacturing Co v Pacific Rim Engineered Products (1987) Ltd, 2011 BCSC 224 at para 124, 84 BLR (4th) 189. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:35 am by Ben Sperry & Kristian Stout
Google monetizes this content through its AdSense service, with ISIS-affiliated users receiving revenue. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Morgan Stanley & Co International Plc v Tael One Partners Ltd, heard 17 November 2014. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]