Search for: "Department of Transp. v. Morris" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Lost in the Shuffle -- Excuse for Default Found Insufficient
11 Aug 2008, 2:40 am
However, counsel "must submit supporting facts in evidentiary form sufficient to justify the default" (Incorporated Vil. of Hempstead v Jablonsky, 283 AD2d 553, 554 [2001]) and include "a detailed explanation of [the] oversights" (Hospital for Joint Diseases v ELRAC, Inc., 11 AD3d 432, 433 [2004]; see also Grezinsky v Mount Hebron Cemetery, 305 AD2d 542 [2003]; Morris v Metropolitan Transp. [read post]
Coverage Counsel - http://nycoveragecounsel.blogspot.com/
Dead Men Tell No Tales
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
See Rowen v. [read post]
The Iowa Edict - http://www.theiowaedict.com/
Valuation Issues in Eminent Domain Litigation: What You Need to Know
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Hilliard v. [read post]
Ackerman Ackerman & Dynkowski Journal - https://ackerman-ackerman.com/journal/