Search for: "Department of Transportation v. Land"
Results 81 - 100
of 603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Velasquez v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Department of Transportation (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 645, 656, fn. 8), and that “cases have wrestled with this distinction[.] [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 12:22 pm
The 1994 case of Somerset Savings Bank v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 9:19 am
Charles Lynn Brownlow, No. 08-0551 (more info) Osler's email sums up the main issue: …whether the Department of Transportation's permanent easement for a water-detention pond adjacent to a widened highway allows the state to excavate soil from the easement for highway work miles away. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:19 pm
Shaw v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 12:26 pm
California Department of Transportation (Dec. 18, 2018, 2018 Cal. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:23 am
I wish I knew what secret forces were pushing to keep the Central Unit in Sugar Land open. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 7:27 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals issued an opinion in TransCare v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:21 pm
The City should find guidance in the experience of the State of California’s Department of Transportation’s (“Caltrans”) attempt to impose a curfew upon operators at San Diego International Airport. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:36 am
Northern California River Watch v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (Administrative Procedure Act; Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974) United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:57 pm
Montana Department of Transportation. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:22 pm
Chaudhuri (Land into Trust)Brakebill v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 5:14 am
Holy Land Found., 2007 U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 11:20 am
[iv] PCSF Agency Expansion The PCSF expanded in November 2022,[v] adding four new partner agencies: (1) the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Energy; (2) the Department of the Interior; (3) the Department of Transportation; and (4) the Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 2:19 am
On Wednesday 19th and Thursday 20th April the Court will hear the case of Secretary of State for Transport v Curzon Park Ltd and others, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 651. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
In its conclusion, the Appeals Court said, "We do not minimize the very real costs that continued operation of the San Luis Unit imposes on downslope lands, and we repeat Firebaugh I's holding that Interior is obliged to find a solution. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 7:00 am
AMEC Civil, LLC, AMEC sued the Virginia Department of Transportation (“VDOT”) seeking more than $21 million in damages. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 6:47 am
" The case of Schysm v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 10:47 am
Wwgmhb Land use opinion. [read post]
