Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. A. R. S." Results 21 - 40 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 12:27 pm
  A panel of the Appellate Division, 3rd Dept., rejected the school district's challenge to a ruling by the state's Public Employment Relations Board that the district violated the NY Civil Service Law by refusing to provide documentation to the AFT local union representing the district's teachers about the reason for the discharge. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
” The e-mail, said the court, “did not reference any official designation of the Hearing Officer” by Coxsackie-Athens and, citing Perez v New York State Dept. of Labor, 244 AD2d 844, ruled that the school district’s reliance on such a writing was insufficient to meet the specific requirement of Civil Service Law §75(2). [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, No. 08-1048TVIISee issue description (+briefs links) at SCOTUSblogSCOTUS docket hereStoyanov v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  Office of Attorney General v Ginger Weatherspoon   It's yet another instance of the high court's game of gotcha. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:20 am
Employer has the burden of proof that a disability prevents the employee from reasonably performing the functions and duties of the position Matter of New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 57 AD3d 1057 New York State Correction Officer Edward J. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
HHS argued that the RFRA was intended to restore the state of the law as it existed before Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
See Callen v Callen, 287 AD2d 818 ( 3rd Dept 2001); In Re Rhianna R., 256 AD2d 1184 (4th Dept 1998) (citing Matter of Cary)(Mahady) v Megrell, 219 AD2d 334 (3rd Dept 1996), Iv App Dismissed, 88 NY2d 1065 1996); Dunbar v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 7:30 pm
 Many if not most homeowners insure their homes under insurance policies that utilize as their main policy form the Insurance Services Office's copyrighted HO-3 endorsement. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:26 am
Dept. of Health and Human Services Government & Administrative Law, Health Law U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Vance v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:45 pm by Guest Blogger
Moriarty, 106 F. 886, 891 (S.D.N.Y.1901)[2] 13 USC §195[3]Dept. of Commerce v. [read post]