Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. J. L. S." Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Nevins, 295 AD2d 887, 887 [4th Dept 2002]; Matter of Presbyterian Hosp. of City of N.Y. v State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 319, 320 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Nevins, 295 AD2d 887, 887 [4th Dept 2002]; Matter of Presbyterian Hosp. of City of N.Y. v State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 319, 320 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm by Giles Peaker
J and L, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon (2017) EWHC 3411 (Admin) This is a very interesting judicial review, concerning the interrelation of a council’s housing duties under Part 6 and Part 7 Housing Act 1996 and duties to children under s.17 Children Act 1989. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
Appellate Division, First Department Support Magistrate properly imputed income to the father based on cash and in-kind support provided by his family, both prior to and after the filing of the petition In Matter of Nannan L v Stephen L, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 559146 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division affirmed an order which denied the father’s petition for a downward modification of his child support obligations. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
Dept. of Child Services - "However, we conclude that the trial court's findings do not support the judgment. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 A school district’s discretion to remove material from its collection, however, must be exercised within “fundamental constitutional safeguards” (Campbell v St. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 A school district’s discretion to remove material from its collection, however, must be exercised within “fundamental constitutional safeguards” (Campbell v St. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am by Joel R. Brandes
Parent’s Incarceration Not an Automatic Reason for Blocking Visitation In Matter of Granger v Miscercola, --- N.E.2d ----, 2013 WL 1798581 (N. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
That tribunal had been the subject of widespread and high-level criticism in relation to its fairness and independence, including from the US Dept of State and the Bar Human Rights Committee. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
The Attention Deficit Disorder Clinic Phone: (602) 423-7770 Phoenix (Northwest) Sanford J. [read post]