Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. J. R." Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Employer has the burden of proof that a disability prevents the employee from reasonably performing the functions and duties of the positionMatter of New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2008 NY Slip Op 09517, Decided on December 4, 2008, Appellate Division, ThirdNew York State Correction Officer Edward J. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm by Public Employment Law Press
On Human Rights, 138 AD3d 532, 533 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm by Giles Peaker
J and L, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon (2017) EWHC 3411 (Admin) This is a very interesting judicial review, concerning the interrelation of a council’s housing duties under Part 6 and Part 7 Housing Act 1996 and duties to children under s.17 Children Act 1989. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
In addition, case law ( JD v East Berkshire and Jain v Trent SHA [2007] EWCA Civ 1186 cited) indicates a ‘greater willingness to find the existence of duties of care subsequent to the passing of the Human Rights Act 2000. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:20 am
Employer has the burden of proof that a disability prevents the employee from reasonably performing the functions and duties of the position Matter of New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 57 AD3d 1057 New York State Correction Officer Edward J. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
It may be downloaded at https://www.childsupport.ny.gov/dcse/pdfs/CSSA.pdf The 2021 poverty income guidelines amount for a single person as reported by the United States Department of Health and Human Services is $12,880 and the 2021 self-support reserve is $17,388. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
The Attention Deficit Disorder Clinic Phone: (602) 423-7770 Phoenix (Northwest) Sanford J. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
Dec. 19, 2008)Absence of 50(b) motion in the trial court deprives Appeals Court of ability to consider AT&T's appeal from J* for EEOC on its religion (Jehovah's Witnesses)/failure-to-accommodate, discharge discrim suitDC Circuit* Adams v. [read post]