Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. J. R. L." Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm by Giles Peaker
J and L, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon (2017) EWHC 3411 (Admin) This is a very interesting judicial review, concerning the interrelation of a council’s housing duties under Part 6 and Part 7 Housing Act 1996 and duties to children under s.17 Children Act 1989. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
Appellate Division, First Department Support Magistrate properly imputed income to the father based on cash and in-kind support provided by his family, both prior to and after the filing of the petition In Matter of Nannan L v Stephen L, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 559146 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division affirmed an order which denied the father’s petition for a downward modification of his child support obligations. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
The Attention Deficit Disorder Clinic Phone: (602) 423-7770 Phoenix (Northwest) Sanford J. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
”[18] Taken together with the general lack of human infallibility, these facts should lower public confidence in the Canadian prosecutorial system because it may lead to an arbitrary and unchecked level of power for the individual prosecutor. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
”[18] Taken together with the general lack of human infallibility, these facts should lower public confidence in the Canadian prosecutorial system because it may lead to an arbitrary and unchecked level of power for the individual prosecutor. [read post]