Search for: "Devadas v Niksarli" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2017, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rutkovsky undertook to treat by, among other things, prescribing reading glasses (see Wilson, 112 AD3d at 500; see also Devadas v Niksarli, 120 AD3d 1000, 1006 [1st Dept 2014][“in determining whether continuous treatment exists, the focus is on whether the patient believed that further treatment was necessary, and whether he sought such treatment”], citing Rizk v Cohen, 73 NY2d 98, 104 [1989]; Simons v Bassett Health Care,… [read post]