Search for: "Diamond v State" Results 121 - 140 of 1,000
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2020, 2:33 pm by Heather Douglas
” – Justice Scalia in Holland v Illinois. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:48 am by Justine Moller
However, the holder may have the following rights in relation to the surface of land: i)        to enter the mining area and take reasonable measures on or under the surface for the purpose of mining operations; ii)       to carry on mining operations and to do all such other acts and things as are necessary for carrying on of those operations; iii)      to dispose of any mineral products recovered; … [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Finally, Diamond tried to get the court to adopt the rule of Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. [read post]
The district court’s judgment was vacated and the case remanded for trial (Tiffany and Company v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 5:29 am by Jessica C. Diamond
  This issue came up several years ago in a New Jersey Supreme Court decision, State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:15 am by Rebecca Tapscott
On August 17, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated and remanded a decision of the district court in Tiffany & Co. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:15 am by Rebecca Tapscott
On August 17, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated and remanded a decision of the district court in Tiffany & Co. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Diamond & Gold Jewelers, Inc., 70 Ohio App. 3d 667, 671, 591 N.E.2d 881, 884 (2d Dist. 1991), and Connor Group v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:22 am by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
In this context, she briefly explained the case MZ Wallace, Inc v Fuller d/n/a The Oliver Thomas & Black Diamond, No. 18-2665 (SDNY, Dec. 2018), in which the plaintiff claimed the defendants infringed its trade dress rights in quilting handbags. [read post]