Search for: "Diane G. Kindermann"
Results 61 - 64
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
City of Oakland (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 884: The city's significance threshold to evaluate seismic impacts did not violate CEQA for two reasons: (1) there is no requirement that a significance threshold be formally adopted; and (2) the significance threshold used substantially conformed to the significance threshold for service impacts in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:35 am
City of Oakland (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 884: The city's significance threshold to evaluate seismic impacts did not violate CEQA for two reasons: (1) there is no requirement that a significance threshold be formally adopted; and (2) the significance threshold used substantially conformed to the significance threshold for service impacts in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:14 am
If you have any questions about these court decisions or about CEQA, contact Leslie, Bill, Cori, Kate or Partners Diane Kindermann and Elizabeth Strahlstrom. [read post]
