Search for: "Diaz v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
“This extension will permit us to conduct a careful review of the right to bring action under Title III in light of the national interests of the United States and efforts to expedite a transition to democracy in Cuba,” the State Department said. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 3:00 am
Here's SCOTUSblog's coverage of the issue:The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:08 am
The followup to last term’s decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 12:19 pm
In the recent case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:46 pm
This case is a response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:04 am
We reverse our holding in Dedman in light of the recent United States Supreme Court case of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:49 am
From his order (via Professor Berman's site):Last year in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:33 pm
In Friday's New York trial court decision in Diaz v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
(Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 1:20 pm
In Ortiz-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:59 am
Ct. 1523 (2013) (Kagan, J., dissenting), and that the Ninth Circuit did as well in Diaz v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:41 pm
Robinson and United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 8:10 pm
Tuesday’s oral argument is in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:18 pm
The issue in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:59 am
On Wednesday, NMCCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm
Following the US Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/11/08/08-10167.pdf United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:13 am
Nunez-Diaz 19-645Issues: (1) Whether the respondent, Hector Sebastion Nunez-Diaz, is categorically barred from establishing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
