Search for: "Dick's Sporting Goods v. Dick's Clothing & Sporting Goods" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
In 2006-7 Umbro granted two separate licences, one to Dick's Sporting Goods -- a major retail company -- and the other to Hudson Bay. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 3:15 am
Umbro then licensed Dick’s Sporting Goods to sell on-field wear in the US.Hudson Bay objected that Umbro let Dick’s sell off-field wear in breach of Hudson Bay’s exclusive licence and that Umbro hindered it in exploiting its licence, in breach of an implied duty of cooperation. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Report and Blog)   Global - Patents New exchange, Intellectual Property Exchange International, can be a game-changer, but will need good patents to thrive (IAM) (Technology Transfer Tactics)   Australia Bittersweet decision for Mars but Cadbury settles purple dispute: Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (Managing IP) (ipwars)   Belgium Belgian Supreme Court prohibits fishing expeditions: Ineos Manufacturing Belgium NV… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]