Search for: "Dick v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2017, 12:00 am by Scott Beatty
Forbes later sent a letter to Sears stating that Sears could not sublease to Dick’s Sporting Goods because Sears had no right to sublease, the sports store lacked signage rights, and Dick’s Sporting Goods “did not belong” at the mall. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 12:00 am by Scott Beatty
Forbes later sent a letter to Sears stating that Sears could not sublease to Dick’s Sporting Goods because Sears had no right to sublease, the sports store lacked signage rights, and Dick’s Sporting Goods “did not belong” at the mall. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
The Supreme Court justices in the Youngstown steel seizure case faced the question of the emergency authority of the President of the United States, not of the person of Harry S. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
Marginal income tax rates in the mid-1980s were 70 percent on so-called unearned income, plus a few more percent tacked on by the states. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:18 am by Mark Patrick
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed without opinion, and the United States Supreme Court denied applications for certiorari from both sides. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:18 am by Mark Patrick
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed without opinion, and the United States Supreme Court denied applications for certiorari from both sides. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm by Susan Hennessey, Helen Klein Murillo
This provision makes it a crime to steal, sell, or convey “any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
Now that he has been sworn in as the 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump is entitled to a four-year lease on the White House. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
Dick was overruled in 1917, this Court has rejected every attempt to invoke patent law to control the use or resale of an article after the first authorized sale in the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
This was cause for Nixon’s concern, and his scheme to block the peace talks from occurring.Per the notes, which I have translated and summarized, Nixon instructed Haldeman that Bryce “Harlow [should be] monitoring [the situation in] V[iet] Nam. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 3:03 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
It clarifies the relationship between two conflicting statutes to encourage the foreign lending of art to the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 8:42 am by Sandy Levinson
 But one reason is that, for all of the justified outrage over Bush v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm by Edward Blum
If the new Justice analyzes the current state of minority electoral opportunity in the United States as did Scalia, the new statute probably won’t survive constitutionality. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:30 am by Shu-Yi Oei
However, in March, the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico ruled in Wal-Mart Puerto Rico v. [read post]