Search for: "Dietze v. King"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2016, 9:00 pm
”[13] The court held that other considerations, such as those identified in Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 2:59 am
Brodeur, 40 Misc 3d 1070, 1073 [Crim Ct, Kings County 2013]; People v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:54 am
Dietze, 75 NY2d 47, 51 [1989], citing Terminiello v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:58 pm
Furthermore, a true threat is one that is “clear, unambiguous, and immediate” (People v Orr, 47 Misc 3d 1213[A] [Crim Ct, NY County 2015]; People v Brodeur, 40 Misc 3d 1070, 1073 [Crim Ct, Kings County 2013]). [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:58 pm
Furthermore, a true threat is one that is “clear, unambiguous, and immediate” (People v Orr, 47 Misc 3d 1213[A] [Crim Ct, NY County 2015]; People v Brodeur, 40 Misc 3d 1070, 1073 [Crim Ct, Kings County 2013]). [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
Wearry v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
King-Washington v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 6:15 am
Jahrhunderts v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Elizabeth Dick, Sibylle Dietz, Karen Dimarco, Felecia Dinsmore, Clint Dipierro, Cathy Disbrow, Debbie Discenza, Jennifer Distaulo, Michael Dobbins, Jeff Dodson, Gretchen Doerr, Chris Doherty, Bill Donaldson, Pamela Donati, Carla Donelson, Susan Donnelly, Cristina Donoso, John Dostal, Louise M. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
E. coli bacteria: what are they, where did they come from, and why are some so dangerous? [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
"Healing ourselves is the essence of democratic development. [read post]
