Search for: "Dillon v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2020, 3:43 pm
Dillon of the Los Angeles Superior Court, will be sitting Pro-Tem in Division Seven until August 31, 2020.Judge Glenn R. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm
Dillon of the Los Angeles Superior Court, will be sitting Pro-Tem in Division Seven until October 31, 2020. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 10:20 am
Dillon of the Los Angeles Superior Court, will be sitting Pro-Tem in Division Seven until October 31, 2020. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:22 am
In Hayes v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 10:15 pm
Dillon v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
Div., 270 AD2d 52 Dillon v Safir, App. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 9:57 am
The most difficult case for the court to harmonize is State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 9:01 am
Dillon v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:25 pm
Superior Court (1996) 13 Cal.4th 1104, 1112 (Carlin); see generally Finn v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 9:29 am
Dillon [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:02 am
Judge Dillon dissented. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:59 am
A superior court judge denied the motion, and the defendant was convicted and appealed. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 12:15 am
A recent ruling by California Superior Court Judge Timothy Patrick Dillon, however, has dealt a blow to the Commissioner's efforts. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 3:00 am
See e.g., Badillo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 6:25 pm
Further, the Supreme Court in Ochoa v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 7:59 am
The defendant was convicted on both counts in district court and appealed for trial de novo in superior court. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
Dillon, 346 F.2d 633 (9th Cir. 1965), and United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, 795 F.2d 796 (9th Cir. 1986), to support its conclusion that attorneys may properly be required to provide pro bono representation. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:14 am
In a partial concurrence, Judge Dillon disagreed with the majority’s holding that the court order in this case was the equivalent of a search warrant. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
Today, the Supreme Court of California in Winn v. [read post]
