Search for: "Dingeman v. Dingeman"
Results 1 - 20
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2015, 1:14 pm
This point has been repeated in a number of cases decided since the decision of Dingemans J (see for example De La Flor Cabrera v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:24 am
legalweek On 16 April, Mr Justice Dingemans in the Queen’s Bench Division handed down judgment in Wellers & Ors v Associated Newspapers Limited [2014] EWHC 1163 (QB), awarding Paul Weller’s three children a total of £10,000 damages for misuse of private information. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 7:01 am
The application for permission to appeal and permission to adduce fresh evidence in the case of Depp v News Group Newspapers was heard today by the Court of Appeal (Underhill and Dingemans LJJ). [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 11:35 am
Truvada tablets Author Jeffrey Beall Licence CC BY-SA 3.0 Source Wikipedia Emtricitabine/tenofovir Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lord Justices Lewison, Floyd and Dingemans) Teva UK Ltd and others v Gilead Sciences, Inc [2019] EWCA Civ 2272 (19 Dec2019) This was an appeal against Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Teva UK Ltd and others v Gilead Sciences Inc [2018] EWHC 2416 [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 4:15 pm
On 20 November 2015, the Master of the Rolls, Tomlinson and Bean LJJ handed down judgment in Weller & Ors v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1176, upholding Dingemans J’s finding of liability for misuse of private information (and breach of the DPA, although this did not add anything as it was common ground that the claim for infringement of the DPA would either stand or fall with the claim for misuse of private information). [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 8:48 am
On 18 March 2021 two Court of Appeal judges will hear an oral application for permission to appeal in the case of Johnny Depp v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 2:38 am
Dingemans J held that this had not caused serious harm to the banker’s reputation in England and Wales. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 5:15 pm
In a judgment handed down on 25 March 2021 ([2021] EWCA Civ 423 [pdf]), the Court of Appeal (Underhill and Dingemans LJJ) refused Johnny Depp’s application for permission to appeal against Mr Justice Nicol’s dismissal of his libel claim against the Sun. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm
On 6 October 2014, Dingemans J handed down judgment in the case of Garcia v Associated Newspapers ([2014] EWHC 3137 (QB)) . [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm
Dingemans, Jay, Julian Knowles and Nicklin JJ were also present along with Senior Master Fontaine, Sir David Eady, Sir Michael Tugendhat and representatives of QB Listing and the MoJ. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
On 25 March 2021 the Court of Appeal (Underhill and Dingemans LJJ) handed down judgment ([2021] EWCA Civ 423 [pdf]), refusing Johnny Depp’s application for permission to appeal against Nicol J’s dismissal of his libel claim against the Sun. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
The Judge’s first judgment In the judgment of Dingemans J in Moulay Hicham v Elaph Publishing [2015] EWHC 1084 (QB) the Judge considered whether the words were capable of bearing a defamatory meaning. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm
The case of Richard Burgon MP v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:08 am
Proceedings in the High Court and the Court of Appeal Dingemans J in the High Court found that there had been a violation of ECHR, art 14 in conjunction with art 8, as Mr Johnson had been treated differently because he was illegitimate. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 1:30 pm
Toms v Ruberry (2019) EWCA Civ 128 This case deals with the lease of a public house. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:06 pm
This is an appeal from a decision of Dingemans J [2013] EWHC 3355 (QB) Reserved judgments are awaited in two Court of Appeal cases heard last term Bewry v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 1:46 am
However, the Court of Appeal (McCombe and Moylan LJJ, Dingemans LJ dissenting) allowed the Respondents’ appeal. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:21 am
On 12 December 2014, Dingemans J dismissed the challenge. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am
At first instance Mr Justice Dingemans applied a ‘but for’ test. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:10 pm
In Theedom v Nourish Training Ltd ([2015] EWHC 3769 (QB)) the court found that the Claimant had satisfied the threshold test of s.1 Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
