Search for: "Dinning v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 5:02 am by Michael Broyde
Take, for example, the 1999 case of Encore Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 11:57 pm
For the software industry, the study states that there is insufficient evidence to conclude whether patents are helping or hindering innovation.The paper covers a myriad of other issues concerning technology transfers and transaction costs, IP market measures, and IP litigation (too many to be effectively covered in a blog post). [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:36 am by Russ Bensing
Stop the Beach v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am by Amy Howe
Din, which in Bier’s view “dealt a blow to the rights of millions of Americans who wish to marry immigrants. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:05 am by Frank Cranmer
Rabbi Shlomo Weissmann, Canopy Forum: Secular Law and Equity in Beth Din Decisions: a fascinating piece from the Director of the Beth Din of America. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
Din, in which a majority of the Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s ruling that a U.S. citizen whose spouse’s application for a visa was denied has a right to judicial review of the denial, and what it might mean for the challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:30 pm by Wells Bennett
New York (state legislatures cannot set maximum hours in particular industries); and Korematsu v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am by Kelly
United States (Patently-O) CAFC finds claim construction arguments waived on appeal: Enovsys LLC v. [read post]