Search for: "Director Pierce" Results 41 - 60 of 809
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2007, 8:14 am
  If the corporation enters into a contract, only the corporation is liable, not you personally, even if you are the sole shareholder, director and officer of the corporation. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 9:17 am by Philip J. Berenz
"Piercing a corporate veil" means an individual can be personally liable in certain situations. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 9:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
He also reviewed various statements in the case law of the circumstances in which courts had suggested that the corporate veil could be pierced and the directors possibly held liable. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
In today’s society there are an increasing number of lawsuits attempting to pierce the corporate veil and go after the personal assets of corporate directors and officers. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:48 pm
But some legal claims can pierce the corporate veil and leave individuals having to defend expensive civil suits. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 11:27 am by Mack Sperling
  The Judge also stayed the arbitration pending a ruling on the piercing the veil basis for the arbitration. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 5:12 am by Nicole Kellner-Swick
In order to determine when the corporate form can be set aside and the veil pierced, the Supreme Court has established the Belvedere test. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:38 am by Ken Laino
  The trial court "pierced the corporate veil" and found the owner to be personally liable. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 9:37 am by Calvin Massey
It's my pleasure to share the news that Professor Ann Bartow has agreed to join UNH Law as Professor and Director of the Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 1:25 am by Matthew Azoulay
The doctrine of “piercing the corporate veil” was developed to prevent the corporate form from being utilized to defeat the ends of justice, perpetrate fraud, accomplish a crime, or otherwise evade the law. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 2:36 pm by Legal Skills Prof
UNH's Franklin Pierce's School of Law Library Director and Professor Susan Zago has a new article in the Legal Reference Services Quarterly that addresses just that - leveraging student passion for several legal practice areas to design a better legal... [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:01 am by Amy Landers
In addition, Ann Bartow (Pace) will be joining the University of New Hampshire School of Law as the Director of the Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property (this announcement is here). [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:01 pm by Dan Filler
This just in: The University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce School of Law (UNH Law), a national leader in practical legal education with a commitment to inclusion, diversity, and quality engagement for all, seeks to hire an Assistant or Associate Clinical Professor to serve as Director of the Legal Residency Program to begin August 2020. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:00 pm by Karel Frielink
These corporations are recognized as legal entities separate from their shareholders and managing directors. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 8:46 am by Arina Shulga
In the next blog posts, I would like to take a closer look at the duty of care as well as the question of when the corporation’s corporate veil (i.e., limited liability) can be pierced. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 2:47 pm
In other words, there must be a causal relationship between the abuse of corporate form by the defendant-owner and the injury of the plaintiff seeking to pierce the corporate veil. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 2:37 pm by Amy Hereford, CSJ, JD, JCL
In one case, even with identity of officers and directors, by itself, a plaintiff could not pierce the corporate veil and impose liability against the Charity. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:03 am by Steven Boutwell
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit became the first court applying Louisiana law to pierce the veil of a Louisiana limited liability company on an “alter ego basis,” adopting from corporate veil piercing jurisprudence a non-exhaustive list of factors, namely: 1) commingling of corporate and shareholder funds; 2) failure to follow statutory formalities for incorporating and transacting corporate affairs; 3) undercapitalization; 4) failure to provide separate bank… [read post]