Search for: "Director for the Dept. of Corrections"
Results 21 - 40
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In 1976, the legislature enacted Correction Law article 23-A and Executive Law § 296 (15) in furtherance of 'the 'general purposes' of the Penal Law,' including ''the rehabilitation of those convicted' and 'the promotion of their successful and productive reentry and reintegration into society' (Matter of Acosta v New York City Dept. of Educ., 16 NY3d 309, 314 [2011], quoting Penal Law § 1.05 [6]; see Matter of Bonacorsa v Van… [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In 1976, the legislature enacted Correction Law article 23-A and Executive Law § 296 (15) in furtherance of 'the 'general purposes' of the Penal Law,' including ''the rehabilitation of those convicted' and 'the promotion of their successful and productive reentry and reintegration into society' (Matter of Acosta v New York City Dept. of Educ., 16 NY3d 309, 314 [2011], quoting Penal Law § 1.05 [6]; see Matter of Bonacorsa v Van… [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm
Co., 215 AD3d 724 [2d Dept 2023]). [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:39 am
CORRECTIONS LAW:
Bill No. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
State of FL Dept of E/P, No. 08-11213 (11th Cir. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am
., 130 AD3d 922 [2d Dept 2015]). [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
The doctrine of judicial estoppel bars a party securing a ruling in his or her favor based on taking a certain position from advancing a contrary position in another action Becerril v City of New York Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 2013 NY Slip Op 06783, Appellate Division, First Department The assistant director [AD] of a day care center applied facility applied for a position with New York City Department of Health (DOH) as an Early Childhood Education Consultant… [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:29 pm
Today’s opinion by Justice Thomas in Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 11:57 am
Their allegations should be fully investigated and promptly corrected. [read post]
17 May 2018, 7:30 pm
Dept. of Justice has filed its amicus brief supporting the agency’s decision to deny immunity. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
Dept., No. 085082 (6th Cir. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:30 am
Correction: they are confusing. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 12:35 pm
Washington Dept. of Corrections Assistant Secretary Scott Blonien did not respond to AMNews inquiries. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:57 am
Libra also argued that Adam’s amended complaint, viewed as a whole, alleged no more than a mere disagreement over the correct direction of ALP’s business, decisions shielded by the common-law business judgment rule. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 10:34 am
The court believed that, in light of the nature of the hearing officer’s finding under review, the deputy director’s statements made it reasonably discernable that the deputy director applied the correct legal standard and considered the record for the proper purpose of reviewing the hearing officer’s decision for substantial evidence. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 10:34 am
The court believed that, in light of the nature of the hearing officer’s finding under review, the deputy director’s statements made it reasonably discernable that the deputy director applied the correct legal standard and considered the record for the proper purpose of reviewing the hearing officer’s decision for substantial evidence. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:53 pm
We note in particular that the court admitted in evidence the double hearsay testimony of the medical director of the Child Advocacy Center with respect to statements made by the victim to a nurse at the center when the medical director was not present, despite the fact that the court had granted defendant's motion in limine seeking to preclude that testimony. [read post]
