Search for: "Dirks v. Securities and Exchange Commission"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
United States, 445 U.S. 222 (1980). [3] Dirks v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 8:16 am
Securities and Exchange Commission). [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Stevens, SEC Litigation Release No. 12813 (1991). 8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43154 (2000) (adopting Release). 9 See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Thursday, December 15, 2022 Tags: corporate disclosure, Insider trading, Institutional Investors, Rule 10b-5-1, SEC, SEC enforcement [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Thursday, December 15, 2022 Tags: corporate disclosure, Insider trading, Institutional Investors, Rule 10b-5-1, SEC, SEC enforcement [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:07 am
With respect to those rulemakings, Beller recalled that there was lots of communication between SEC staff and the Commission and that there was remarkably little ego involved in the whole process with no push back from Congress on what the Commission ultimately implemented. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:54 am
Eddy, and Sabastian V. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
Second, the Court held that the Commission did not exceed its rulemaking authority by adopting Exchange Act Rule 14e-3(a) to bar trading on undisclosed information in tender offers, even in the absence of a duty to disclose.It is the first question in O’Hagan that has likely drawn the most commentary. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
” Proposed FEC Rule Would Further Constrain Foreign Election Contributions National Public Radio – Philip Ewing | Published: 8/1/2019 The FEC proposed new rules to outlaw exchanges like the one that took place when a Russian delegation visited Trump Tower in 2016 to offer Donald Trump’s campaign “dirt” on Democrats. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 3:07 pm
§ 78j) and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Tags: Broker-dealers, Compliance & ethics, Conflicts of interest, Fiduciary duties, Investment advisers, Investor protection, Regulation Best Interest, Retail investors, SEC, Securities regulation, Transparency Statement on Retirement of Chief Justice Strine Posted by Jay Clayton, U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 7:33 am
Securities and Exchange Commission to affirm Bassam Salman's conviction because, under Dirks, the jury could infer that Salman's tipper personally benefited from making a gift of confidential information to a trading relative. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:14 am
In Dirks v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:43 am
Securities and Exchange Commission in 1983. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 6:11 am
Securities and Exchange Commission (1983), the precedent that established a “personal benefit” test for joint tipper-tippee liability under the federal securities laws. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
For example, Avakian noted that in the Payton v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 2:37 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission (Dirks), which required proof that the insider “directly or indirectly” gained something from the initial disclosure. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 2:37 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission (Dirks), which required proof that the insider “directly or indirectly” gained something from the initial disclosure. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:08 pm
This ruling was based upon the 1983 Supreme Court decision, Dirks v. [read post]
