Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnston"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2011, 3:52 am
Anatomy of a hearing officer's disciplinary findings and recommendationAverill Park CSD v Craig Landin, Decision of Hearing Officer Howard A. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 12:21 pm
George, Hartz, Lundeen, Fulmer, Johnstone, King & Stevens, P.A. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
C.A., January 26, 2012) (34694) Jan. 17, 2013 (Supreme Advocacy LLP's own Marie-France Major [winning] co-counsel [with Michael Cook] at the S.C.C.) [read post]
