Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. Scott"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
” Introducing the personnel record: In Scott v Wetzler, 195 AD2d 905, the Appellate Division, Third Department rejected Scott's argument that he was denied due process because the Section 75 hearing officer allowed evidence concerning his performance evaluations to be introduced during the disciplinary hearing. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
” In Scott v Wetzler, 195 AD2d 905, the Appellate Division, Third Department rejected Scott’s argument that he was denied due process because the Section 75 hearing officer allowed evidence concerning his performance evaluations to be introduced during the disciplinary hearing. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:42 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
Morris of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
Morris of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 9:59 am
Scott Kern. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 4:31 am
A defense counsel failing in those obligations opens himself up to disciplinary proceedings as well as a civil suit for malpractice. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:03 am
Which finally gets us to Scott McInnis. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 3:00 am
(Brady v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm
From Massachusetts judge Brian Davis's opinion Monday in Smith v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:51 am
FEC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:41 am
Div. 1st, Decided June 5, 2012) Before: Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Catterson and Acosta, JJ.Decided: June 5, 2012 Jorge Dopico, Chief Counsel, Departmental Disciplinary Committee, New York (Scott D. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:56 pm
Office of Disciplinary Counsel. [read post]
14 Jun 2006, 6:53 am
Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:42 am
The Rudder case shows that the employer is liable only for off-duty acts involving the performance of official duties.Rudder was involved in an automobile accident with Scott V. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:42 pm
Scott Dodson, of the University of Arkansas writes a swell article on how the Supreme Court screwed up Bowles v. [read post]
