Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. Thomas"
Results 1 - 20
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2020, 9:05 am
An interesting bar case will be heard on July 22 by the Ohio Supreme Court Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 12:57 pm
Dan Trevas has a summary of an attorney discipline matter up for oral argument bef ore the Ohio Supreme Court tomorrow Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:32 am
An oral argument scheduled this morning before the Ohio Supreme Court Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:52 am
State Supreme Court Justice Thomas P. [read post]
16 May 2008, 7:29 am
Thomas appears to indicate a knowing failure on the part of Holme Roberts & Owen to disclose to the Court contrary controlling authority, a duty which had been activated by defendant's counsel's failure to cite the case.If this occurred, it would be a violation of the Disciplinary Rules. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 10:06 am
Thomas M. [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:04 am
Upon discovering Kurtzrock’s violation of Brady v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 4:05 pm
Thomas, No. 08-0688/AR; United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:33 am
Counsel responded that both the disciplinary and the revocation proceedings were administrative. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 9:38 am
The case is White v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:25 am
Significantly, said the Appellate Division, the individual did not challenge the disciplinary findings against her. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
Significantly, said the Appellate Division, the individual did not challenge the disciplinary findings against her. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 3:45 pm
This spreadsheet or electronic platform may be discoverable, unless you involve counsel so you may want to consult counsel concerning its creation. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 10:12 am
McLean Co., Kaufman v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 9:32 pm
William Curtis, deputy chief counsel Warren Stracener, assistant chief counsel Linda Mayhew and labor relations counsel Christopher Thomas will be arguing that they shouldn't be getting paid. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:39 am
Thomas. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 4:39 am
The Full Court referred with approval to the decision of the Master of the Rolls, Sir Thomas Bingham, in Ridehalgh v Horsefield (1994) 3 All ER 848 at 855 and said at p 82,365:Pursuant to s 117(2) Family Law Act, the court has jurisdiction to make an order for costs against a solicitor or a non-party. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Corp., 84 NY2d 488, 493 [1994]; Matter of Thomas v New York City Dept. of Educ., 103 AD3d 495, 498 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Corp., 84 NY2d 488, 493 [1994]; Matter of Thomas v New York City Dept. of Educ., 103 AD3d 495, 498 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Two cases illustrate some of the problems with the use of outside counsel for internal investigations. [read post]
