Search for: "District Properties Associates et al., Appellants v. the District of Columbia et al" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The case was referred by a Bulgarian district court after an entrepreneur was accused of selling counterfeit clothing featuring globally recognised trademarks. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Despite this uncertainty, the judge flatly asserted: “The plaintiff trade associations represent all the Platforms covered by HB 20. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Jordan Brunner
District Court for the District of Columbia against the Defense and Treasury departments for alleged violations of their due process rights. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:37 pm by David Kopel
A law that improperly prevents huge numbers of law-abiding persons from acquiring ammunition is straightforwardly unconstitutional under the methodology used by the Supreme Court in its leading Second Amendment cases, District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit--has gone on to also address the other half of the RFRA equation:  the D.C. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Property is quite useful for developing an understanding of the structures for managing the power to control and exploit things, principally real estate in the first year. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
§ 1681t, preempts a California statute that creates a private damages remedy for violations of state law with respect to the obligations of furnishers of information to CRAs.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for the American Bankers Association et al.Amicus brief for the California Apartment AssociationAmicus brief for the Consumer Data Industry Association Title: Wilson… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Boston Scientific (Docket Report)(271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Allegation that plaintiff ‘buried’ prior art in IDS is sufficient to state of claim for inequitable conduct: CIVIX-DDI LLC v National Association of Realtors et al (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Attorney delinquence excuses 7 year delay in reviving expired patent: SprinGuard Technology Group Inc. v USPTO (271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
AND HILLVALE MEDICAL GROUP ASSOCIATION D/B/A HILLVALE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-05-00063-CV, 198 SW3d 96, 04-27-06 Opinion of the Dallas court of Appeals) 2 petitions. [read post]