Search for: "District of Columbia v. DOL"
Results 61 - 80
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2014, 5:20 am
In this case, after exhausting their administrative remedies (i.e. filing with the DOL and being told the DOL could not pursue their claims) the plaintiffs—employees of a sub-contractor on a job for the District of Columbia—sued on the bond of general contractor to seek payment of their wages. [read post]
Court Upholds New Jersey Law Prohibiting Job Ads Requiring Job Applicants Who Are Currently Employed
30 Jan 2014, 4:45 am
It also noted that Oregon, the District of Columbia and New York City have passed similar laws over the past several years, and Rhode Island is considering doing the same. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held in National Ass'n of Manufacturers v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:37 am
The DOL’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) affirmed the ALJ’s decision on May 29, 2009 (OFCCP v UPMC Braddock, DOL ARB, No 08-048). [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:59 pm
In the first case, United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:32 am
The EBSA has released new guidance interpreting the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 4:40 am
In the meantime, if you are a covered employer operating in one of the 13 states that permits same-sex marriage, or the District of Columbia where same-sex marriage is recognized, now is the time to revise your policies, procedures and forms to conform with the DOL’s updated guidance. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:46 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia vacated a DOL Administrative Interpretation issued in 2010 which declared that Mortgage Loan Officers are not exempt from the FLSA overtime requirements. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:46 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia vacated a DOL Administrative Interpretation issued in 2010 which declared that Mortgage Loan Officers are not exempt from the FLSA overtime requirements. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:58 pm
Supreme Court’s 1947 opinion in Walling v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:18 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia affirmed the ARB’s decision. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:00 pm
The decision, UPMC Braddock v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia reviewed a collection of Motions to Dismiss and, upon consideration of the Motions, the court dismissed all of the employees’ claims. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 10:34 pm
Separately, the Center for Individual Freedom indicated that it had petitioned the FEC for a narrow rulemaking to address the specific issues noted by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in its judgment reversing the district court and finding the statute anything but clear. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 10:35 pm
TSA Passenger Screening: The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in an order that most of the media missed, last week denied a follow up writ of mandamus to compel the rulemaking the court ordered in July 2011 in Electronic Privacy Information Center v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
The rule is currently subject to a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the court has severed issues relating to the methodology supporting the revisions of section 112 of the CAA for expedited review (No. 12-1272). [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
The rule is currently subject to a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the court has severed issues relating to the methodology supporting the revisions of section 112 of the CAA for expedited review (No. 12-1272). [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:35 pm
(United Space Alliance, LLC v Solis, No 11-746 (RCL), November 14, 2011). [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 10:17 pm
Well Targeted: The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia leveled a well-targeted jab at counsel in National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:16 pm
At the end of last month, this blog noted that the United States District Court for the District of Columbia would hear cross motions to dismiss / summary judgment in National Restaurant Association [NRA] v. [read post]
