Search for: "District of Columbia v. Johnson"
Results 41 - 60
of 345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2011, 9:44 am
Circuit’s decision in Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
The first was in probable-cause and qualified-immunity case District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 10:30 am
Johnson & Johnson Corp. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 11:44 am
It is possible, during yesterday’s second argument (in Johnson v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
First on the argument docket is qualified-immunity case District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:28 am
Columbia Natural Gas Resources, 633 S.E.2d 22 (W. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:11 am
Other partners include the district's Title V/CSHCN program. [read post]
24 May 2008, 10:32 am
District of Columbia, 248 F.R.D. 46, 53 (D.D.C. 2008) (quoting Wood v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm
Addressing the merits of the Title VII claim, the district court determined that his claim was controlled by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Johnson v Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County, California (480 U.S. 616 (1987)), and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v Weber (20 EPD ¶30,026 (1979). [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
In 1867, President Andrew Johnson vetoed a bill granting adult citizens of the District — including Black men — the right to vote. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) Our first, second and third posts, based on briefs we submitted to the District Courts for the Southern District of New York and the District of Columbia, explained that because the president does not hold an “Office . . . under the United States,” he or she is not subject to the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 6:06 pm
The case is Esparza v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 4:10 am
Stores, Inc., 357 F.3d 827 (8th Cir.2004); Johnson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
We've been keeping an eye on some interesting litigation in the District of Columbia, Iacangelo v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:41 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit today held that a federal statute, which imposes a tax on awards of compensatory damages for emotional distress and loss of reputation, is unconstitutional because such awards are not "income" within the meaning of the Sixteenth Amendment. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:03 pm
District of Columbia. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
He was Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division during Lyndon Johnson's administration, a long-time partner at the Washington law firm of Shea & Gardner, and an imaginative, dedicated, and extremely thoughtful President of the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit, the kind of lawyer a legal historian dreams of working with but rarely finds. [read post]
17 May 2017, 4:10 am
At The National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen notes that in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Oct.4, 2012); Johnson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
Johnson v. [read post]
