Search for: "District of Columbia v. Johnson" Results 161 - 180 of 346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2018, 2:16 pm by Andrew Hamm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit applied the standard for Section 1983 claims by prisoners that Friendly had articulated in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
Supreme Court grants certiorari in District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 8:18 am by John Floyd
Thomsen of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland from 1976 to 1977 and was an associate of Steptoe & Johnson from 1977 to 1980. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am by Scott Bomboy
A federal judge agreed with Fischer, but the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled the statute applies to “all forms of obstructive conduct. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am by James Bickford
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
§924(c)(3)(B), is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:46 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Jewell 13-56Issue: (1) Whether – as the Third, Seventh, and Eleventh Circuits hold – a district court possesses authority to prevent circumvention of its orders by imposing sanctions on conduct that violates the understood purpose of an injunction, but not its explicit terms, or whether – as the First, Second, Fifth, and Tenth Circuits hold – the four corners of an injunction’s text limit a district court’s civil contempt authority; (2)… [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
Together with the serial relist of Friedman, the fate of Caetano will give our clearest indication yet whether the Court has any appetite to add gloss to District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
City of Chicago – Two years ago in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
Johnson & Johnson (Kluwer) EWHC (Pat) finds no infringement of coronary stent patents: Abbott Laboratories Limited v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 12:28 pm by David Kopel
More broadly, Bruen instructed lower courts to decide Second Amendment cases the way that Court had decided District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUDocket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]