Search for: "District of Columbia v. Jones" Results 1 - 20 of 330
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am by Scott Bomboy
A federal judge agreed with Fischer, but the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled the statute applies to “all forms of obstructive conduct. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reinstated the charge against Fischer, whose petition for Supreme Court review was granted earlier this year. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
 Canada On 2 January 2024, the Supreme Court of British Columbia awarded summary judgement on the issue of quantum in favour of the plaintiff in the case of Pineau v Glacier Media Inc 2024 BCSC 4. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed and reinstated the charges against Fischer (as well as those against two other men). [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decision puts a hold on the limited gag order to give the judges time to consider Trump’s request for a longer pause on the restrictions while his appeals play out. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit concluded that the Civil Service Reform Act barred such a suit brought by Jason Payne, a civilian employee of the Department of the Navy. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm by Frank Cranmer
Philip Jones, Ecclesiastical Law: Cathedral Cities: England and Wales. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 10:59 am by Thomas B. Griffith
The District of Columbia’s Brokerage Act required JLL to obtain the written consent of all clients on both sides. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:14 am by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
In 2017, a wine bar sued President Trump in the District of Columbia’s courts for unfair competition, and that case was removed to federal district court. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
At the time this wasn’t a serious problem in the District of Columbia but with the expansion of government employment during and after World War I (and the extension of the federal pension system), it became one as a really large proportion of the District’s population was disqualified. [read post]