Search for: "District of Columbia v. Jordan"
Results 61 - 80
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am
Russell Spivak summarized the petition submitted by the Center for Constitutional Rights to the federal district court for the District of Columbia for a grant of habeas on behalf of 11 Guantanamo Bay detainees who have been held without charge or trial for years—many for almost 15 years or more. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am
At Bloomberg BNA, Jordan Rubin explains why in Carpenter v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 4:23 am
District of Columbia, which involves the effect of a tolling provision in the federal supplemental-jurisdiction statute on litigants who want to pursue state-court claims after related federal claims have been dismissed. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:19 am
This was the sequence of events in the case of Ahmed Abu Khattala, currently pending trial in federal district court in the District of Columbia for multiple offenses relating to the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, which resulted in the deaths of the U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:04 am
Circuit’s ruling in Jaber v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am
Jordan Lorence of the Alliance Defending Freedom is here, likely awaiting the decision in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
Chicago and District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:13 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in Paracha v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
On 28 October 2016 Haddon-Cave J handed down judgment in the case of Begg v BBC ([2016] EWHC 2688 (QB)) [pdf]. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:02 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am
District Court for the District of Columbia has issued an injunction against the NSA's bulk metadata collection program in Klayman v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
ASARCO engaged Baker Botts and Jordan, Hyden, Womble, Culbreth & Holzer to provide legal representation during the bankruptcy. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
The district court denied the officials qualified immunity and the Third Circuit affirmed. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
A decision of a British Columbia court in I.J. v. [read post]
