Search for: "District of Columbia v. Little" Results 61 - 80 of 1,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
” Moreover, the earlier ban was imposed in 1994 — before the Supreme Court ruled in District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Saraphin Dhanani
District Court for the District of Columbia handed down an opinion in the case of United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
”[17] The court found this explanation more than a little problematic. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
District of Columbia, 670 F.3d 1244 (D.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 12:57 am by Florian Mueller
Mehta of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to focus on the entirety of Google's allegedly anticompetitive actions as opposed to looking at individual agreements with other parties in isolation.That argument comes up many times in either opposition brief, and the plaintiffs refer to the 2001 Microsoft decision that is controlling case law in the D.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:10 am by jonathanturley
That was before the Supreme Court recognized that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to gun ownership in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 7:31 am
 As I argue at length elsewhere, the Court does no original meaning analysis of its own, relying instead on its prior opinion of District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:57 am by Roger Parloff
Each pointed the finger at the alleged bias of District of Columbia juries. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
Twenty states and the District of Columbia have laws prohibiting or restricting the practice of conversion therapy, which seeks to change an individual's sexual orientation or gender identity. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Saraphin Dhanani
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is sparsely populated—a surprise given that the court is about to hear an appeal with the power to topple hundreds of prosecutions of Jan. 6 rioters. [read post]
The authors surmise that, while the Justice Department would prefer to bring the charges in the District of Columbia, it is questionable whether venue in D.C. is proper. [read post]