Search for: "District of Columbia v. Little" Results 81 - 100 of 1,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Each year, scholars at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy estimate cigarette smuggling rates for each state.[1] Their most recent report uses 2020 data and finds a strong positive relationship between cigarette smuggling and tax rates across U.S. states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ever since the Court’s watershed decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:55 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which frequently fields challenges to agency action. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
  When the legitimacy of the government’s motives for its action are genuinely at issue in a litigation, little further showing appears to be required to breach the privilege. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 12:13 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld his ruling. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 3:56 am by SHG
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Those investigations and prosecutions remain under the authority of the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 4:32 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Pursuant to Congress's spending power, ARPA set aside $195.3 billion in stimulus funds, to be distributed by the Treasury Department to states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:00 am by Daniel Gilman
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, sitting by designation in the U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Although the groundbreaking 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Key Findings Massachusetts’ tax advantage in New England is primarily driven by its competitive individual income tax rate and its sales and use tax structure. [read post]
Noting the 2020 rule “constrained the joint-employer standard,” and buttressed by a belief “that the 2020 final rule…repeats the errors that the Board corrected in BFI,” the Biden Board has now proposed to rescind the current standard and replace it with a new rule that incorporates the BFI standard and responds to the District of Columbia Circuit’s invitation for the Board to refine that standard in its 2018 decision on review of BFI (in… [read post]