Search for: "District of Columbia v. Mitchell"
Results 41 - 60
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am
Still pending in the District Court for the District of Columbia is Doe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:03 am
And in 1978, the House and Senate approved an amendment to grant congressional voting rights to the District of Columbia after hearing were held in Bayh’s subcommittee. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am
District of Columbia, Citizens United v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
District Judge Tan Ikram will give a written judgement on the case on 2 June 2016. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc,, 454 P.2d 244, 247 (Alaska 1969).ArizonaNo Arizona court has directly passed on innovator liability, but the federal district court in the Darvocetlitigation twice held that the theory was incompatible with Arizona law. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm
Mitchell, with fifteen minutes of time. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:06 pm
The cases are EPA v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the Food and Drug Administration was wrong to allow sodium thiopental to be imported for executions because it is an unapproved drug. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:11 pm
By Mitchel Wilson In Primas v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
The Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Attorney for the District of Columbia for prosecution. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:36 am
District of Columbia, 121 F. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was “wrong” in August when it reversed the drug dealer’s conviction, which was based on warrants to search and find drugs in the locations where defendant Antoine Jones had traveled. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
Robles (2006), an opinion stunning in its contortions, as Seattle University Law Professor John Mitchell’s article demonstrates. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:28 am
Lyon, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, Palo Alto, CA• Mitchell A. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
