Search for: "District of Columbia v. Sullivan" Results 1 - 20 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2007, 6:19 pm
As previously reported in the Blog, Judge Sullivan in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, surprised many antitrust lawyers by granting applications from a number of competitors and consumer groups and commencing extensive proceedings under the amended Tunney Act to review the consent decree reflecting Department of Justice approval of the merger between SBC and AT&T. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 7:49 pm by Ruthann Robson
Sessions, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia, Emmet Sullivan reiterated his oral order "requiring the Defendants to... [read post]
A judge for the US District Court for the District of Columbia ordered preliminary injunctions Sunday and Monday against the US Postal Service (USPS) to prevent policy changes that have delayed national mail delivery. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 2:39 am
Sullivan released the following statement on the recent Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia et. al. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:26 am by Gabrielle Wast
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a brief in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Monday, asking the court to order the dismissal of the case against Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump’s former national security advisor The DOJ is urging the appeals court to direct Judge Emmet Sullivan of the US District Court for the District of Columbia to grant the government’s Rule 48(a) motion to dismiss the… [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Samuel Bray
Judge Sullivan of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued this minute order in the docket: MINUTE ORDER granting 166 Unopposed Emergency Motion for Temporary Stay of the Court's November 15, 2022 Order ("Emergency Mot. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am by David S. Dessen, Esq.
Sullivan, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit approved the use of statistical sampling and extrapolation by Medicare contractors, currently known as MACs or ZPICs, in conducting post payment reviews. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am by David S. Dessen, Esq.
Sullivan, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit approved the use of statistical sampling and extrapolation by Medicare contractors, currently known as MACs or ZPICs, in conducting post payment reviews. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am by David S. Dessen, Esq.
Sullivan, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit approved the use of statistical sampling and extrapolation by Medicare contractors, currently known as MACs or ZPICs, in conducting post payment reviews. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am by David S. Dessen, Esq.
Sullivan, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit approved the use of statistical sampling and extrapolation by Medicare contractors, currently known as MACs or ZPICs, in conducting post payment reviews. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:32 pm by Douglas Melcher
The division’s reasoning in 718 Associates is noteworthy because the prior case law that it deemed controlling was decided in 1892 by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia sitting in General Term. 718 Assocs., Nos. 08-CV-1571 & 09-CV-744, slip op. at 11 (citing Sullivan v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 7:23 pm
An alternative analysis, where the missing conjunction is modeled as a covert proform, is proposed, and consequences of the analysis are considered – in particular, I present a novel argument that the US Supreme Court’s controversial decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:57 pm by Christine Corcos
An alternative analysis, where the missing conjunction is modeled as a covert proform, is proposed, and consequences of the analysis are considered – in particular, I present a novel argument that the US Supreme Court’s controversial decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 3:35 am by SHG
Based on the 92-page decision by District of Columbia Judge Emmett G. [read post]