Search for: "Dixon, Appeal of" Results 1 - 20 of 652
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2008, 12:52 pm
The judgment of the Court of Appeal in Dixon v Marchant, handed down yesterday, may, I think, lead to some debate, and not just amongst family lawyers. [read post]
” Lawyers for Dixon said they will appeal the ruling to the Arizona Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:20 am
Marchant v Dixon Court of Appeal “The remarriage of a former wife soon after the making of a consent order as to financial arrangements in a divorce settlement did not necessarily invalidate that order. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Dobb’s invocation of democracy has obvious intuitive appeal, but it is a deeply problematic claim. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:14 am
Attorney-General's Reference (No 29 of 2008) (Jon Peter Dixon) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “A non-custodial sentence for sexual offences against a child under 13 where the child had been a willing participant did not meet the essential fact that the law was there not only to protect children from the baleful influence of adults with an inappropriate interest in children but was also designed to protect children from themselves. [read post]
11 May 2022, 12:43 pm by William Hibbitts | JURIST Staff
On Tuesday the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld District Judge Diane Humetewa’s decision to deny Dixon’s petition for habeas corpus and a stay of execution. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:27 pm by [email protected]
The 7th Court of Appeals overturned Dixon’s conviction in December 2018. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:27 pm by [email protected]
The 7th Court of Appeals overturned Dixon’s conviction in December 2018. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:56 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Judge Sweeney is not going to declare a mistrial over it and neither is the Maryland Court of Special Appeals. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 4:04 pm by Steve Kalar
Id.Issue(s): “Dixon appeals only his sentence, claiming, as he did in the district court, that he did not have three ‘violent felony’ convictions, as defined by the ACCA, and thus does not qualify for the mandatory minimum sentence. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:54 am
Dixon and Carr | Download 12/23/2008 By BOB KASARDA A federal appeals court in Chicago ruled Monday that an enhanced federal sex offender registry law cannot be applied to those who violated the law before it took effect. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:12 pm
To the contrary, the Court of Appeals noted that by all accounts, Dixon voluntarily removed the will from his safe deposit box and destroyed it. [read post]