Search for: "Dixon v. Russell" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2021, 7:08 am by CMS
They relied upon the Court of Appeal authority of Pritam Kaur v S Russell and Sons [1973] QB 336 and the first instance decision in Marren v Dawson Bentley & Co Ltd [1961] 2 QB135, which established that where a cause of action accrues part way through a day, that day should be excluded for limitation purposes. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm by Sandy Levinson
9:00am-10:45amChair: William Forbath (Texas)Samuel Issacharoff (NYU)Scot Peterson (Oxford)Mark Tushnet (Harvard)Mila Versteeg (Virginia) Session VI: Constitutional Replacement by Constitutional Amendment11:00am-12:45pmChair: Sergio Verdugo (Universidad del Desarrollo – Chile)Carlos Bernal (Constitutional Court of Colombia)John Dinan (Wake Forest)Rosalind Dixon (Australia, University of New South Wales)Sanford Levinson (Texas) [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
In the case of von Marburg v Aldred ([2015] VSC 467)  Dixon J considered the principles which apply to pleading a claim concerning publication on Facebook. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
Docket No. 10-1042   Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the petitioners in this case, which is listed without regard to the likelihood that it will be granted. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
  More from Kevin Russell about those grants here. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Right-Wing Think Tank Claimed to Be a Church. [read post]