Search for: "Dobs v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm
What follows is the text of Mote’s written summary, addressed to Bagley and forwarded by Bagley to Skolfield: “Good afternoon, I received the attached text this morning form SSG Hodgson in reference to Sergeant First Class Robert Card DOB 04-04-83. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that "In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence* to support the determination", citing Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 215 AD3d 844, and Matter of Lau v NYC DOB, 209 AD3d 858. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that "In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence* to support the determination", citing Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 215 AD3d 844, and Matter of Lau v NYC DOB, 209 AD3d 858. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:19 am
” Arizona v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 3:44 am
” “Here, the plaintiff failed to state causes of action sounding in breach of contract, legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud, as she failed to adequately allege the element of [*2]damages with respect to each of those causes of action (see Denisco v Uysal, 195 AD3d 989 [2021]; McSpedon v Levine, 158 AD3d 618, 621 [2018]; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 848 [2012]; Smith v Chase… [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 3:58 am
Here, the plaintiff failed to state causes of action sounding in breach of contract, legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud, as she failed to adequately allege the element of [*2]damages with respect to each of those causes of action (see Denisco v Uysal, 195 AD3d 989; McSpedon v Levine, 158 AD3d 618, 621; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 848; Smith v Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, 293 AD2d 598,… [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:37 am
In TitleMax of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 4:43 am
After some litigation the attorneys third-party the seller in Wiles v JLC & Assoc. [read post]
5 May 2020, 9:32 am
The Connecticut federal district court has ruled in Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency v. [read post]
I entered on the Visa Waiver Program, now I’m stuck in the US. What can I do to prevent an Overstay?
16 Apr 2020, 4:21 pm
As you may be aware, the VWP allows citizens or nationals of certain participating countries the ability to travel to the United States for a temporary period of 90 days or less without having to obtain a United States visa. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:00 pm
Upon CAB’s applications, the DOB issued building permits for a major alteration at the subject property. the Supreme Court denied the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and granted the DOB’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 2:41 pm
Singer v City of New York, 2019 WL 5540881 (SDNY 9/30/2019) [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am
Co. v Farrell, 57 AD3d 721 [2d Dept 2008]). [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 4:33 am
” Wei Cheng Chang v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
Unifund,[5] and the same is true of other states. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 5:42 pm
., Grogan v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 4:24 am
Perotto states that his firm did not install the boiler, supervise its installation or certify to the DOB that it was properly installed. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 10:29 am
J.S., by his family v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
