Search for: "Dockery v. Dockery"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2021, 11:37 am
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Request for review In 2008, Cordaro Andy Dockery, appellant, pleaded guilty to armed robbery and a related handgun charge, and the court sentenced him to a total of 20 years’ incarceration, all but five years suspended. [read post]
29 May 2008, 12:55 am
Employee's objection to the introduction of a "911 recording" in a disciplinary hearing rejectedMatter of Raeshan Dockery v New York City Hous. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:12 am
In Dockery v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:10 pm
With individual sentences topping out at more than 300 words each, Eric Turkewitz of the New York Personal Injury Blog sure thinks so: A decision from the Second Department in December in Dockery v Sprecher, regarding a $109M medical malpractice... [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:53 am
Here's the first sentence from Dockery v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 1:45 pm
On December 22, 2009, in Dockery v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
Employee’s objection to the introduction of a “911 recording” in a disciplinary hearing rejected Matter of Dockery v New York City Hous. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
Filed in 2013, the five-week trial brings to a close Dockery, et. al. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:51 am
Other big names involved in the productions are John Hurt, David Suchet, and Michelle Dockery. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 5:46 am
Dockery v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 7:11 am
In State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 6:23 pm
In the case of Dockery v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:39 am
In Dockery v. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
In Ajala v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 9:28 am
Dockery v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 2:48 am
Dockery) [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:00 am
Exhibit A: A decision from the Second Department in December in Dockery v Sprecher, regarding a $109M medical malpractice verdict that was reduced to $9 million for a brain damaged man. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:03 pm
We affirm. * * * Burkhart argues the contemporaneous document doctrine should not apply because the Elks were not a party to the Dockery-Murat deed. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 2:18 am
Patent and Trademark Office announced plans to drop controversial proposed patent rules that were challenged in Tafas v. [read post]
