Search for: "Doctor Does 1-10"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,879
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2019, 5:16 pm
§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C)) and one count of health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 10:04 pm
However, blood work was done on May 10, 2006, and the doctor’s physician’s assistant allegedly reviewed the laboratory report that was prepared on May 11, 2006. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 6:07 am
” Does your energy drink make you crash? [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 10:14 am
That does a tremendous disservice to the patient and the public. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:31 am
” The doctor was also faulted for assuming that the child was developing type 2 diabetes and not even considering that the child was developing type 1 diabetes. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 6:11 pm
" We are almost obsessed with cancer screening: Recent figures show that about 6 in 10 adults submitted to a colonoscopy more often than they needed to; 1 in 3 men who got a PSA test to screen for prostate cancer didn’t recall their doctor suggesting they do so; nearly 7 in 10 women who had their cervix removed during a hysterectomy still got tested for cervical cancer — that is, they were tested for an organ they no longer possessed! [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:01 am
Supposedly, due to those readings, the plaintiff decided, contrary to doctor’s orders to stop taking his medication and to use a “homeopathic” regimen of his own concoction (fish oil and something called “Co-Q 10”) instead. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:23 pm
Fla.) concludes that Doe had to sue under his own name: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(a) requires that "every pleading" in federal court "name all the parties. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:17 pm
The most likely explanations are (1) jurors generally trust their own doctors, and (2) the dearth of esteemed doctors willing to stand up and testify against other doctors in the same specialty. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:17 pm
The most likely explanations are (1) jurors generally trust their own doctors, and (2) the dearth of esteemed doctors willing to stand up and testify against other doctors in the same specialty. [read post]
1 May 2010, 2:10 pm
The Department of Corrections actually does the injection. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:06 pm
A 1% penalty was applied this year to thousands of doctors who did not report enough eligible electronic prescribing situations with their patients last year. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
’ Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 10(c). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:38 am
Does 1-100, CIV095020; plus the apparently related Henry v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 10:02 am
On 1/21/10 the CA Supreme Court overturned the limits set by the legislature at PC § 11362.7 et seq. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:37 pm
The website includes in their evaluation of the lawyer or doctor the following factors: (1) Client / patient reviews; (2) Experience; (3) Disciplinary history; and (4) Peer endorsements This information can be invaluable to the client or patient as he or she researches exactly which attorney or doctor they need. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 9:48 am
While the doctor's malpractice insurance will pay the physician's share of the verdict, Walters will only receive $300,000 of the $10 million portion for pain, suffering, impairment and disfigurement, as the amount is limited by Colorado Law. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 11:55 pm
Tr. of John Doe 1 in Taylor v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 1:18 pm
By writing that you can do a certain level of work when you cannot actually do that much activity, they may be seriously hurting your disability case.If your doctor has been asked to complete any forms that state what your restrictions and limitations are, it is a good idea to provide them with the following guidelines (taken directly from the U.S. government's Dictionary of Occupational Titles) for the requirements of each type of work:Sedentary Work - exerting (lifting or… [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
Oct 10, 2014), and rejected a HIPAA challenge to a Florida statute allowing – indeed effectively routinizing (if the doctor is willing) – informal treater interviews. [read post]
